Manuscript with arrow icon Book and magnifying glass icon Cross-check icon Process checklist icon Reputation ribbon icon Graduation cap icon Question speech bubble icon Headset call icon Mobile phone call icon Login arrow icon B+ Paper Icon Becoming B+ Paper Icon Checkmark Paper Icon Feedback Speech Bubble Icon Feedback Double Speech Bubble Icon Similarity Check Icon Professional Development Icon Admin Training Icon Instructor Training Icon Student Training Icon Integrations Icon System Status Icon System Requirements Icon Menu Icon Checkmark Icon Download Icon Rubric Icon Prompt Icon QuickMark Set Icon Lesson Plan Icon Success Story Icon Infographic Icon White Paper Icon White Paper Icon Press Release Icon News Story Icon Event Icon Webcast Icon Video Icon Envelope Icon Plaque Icon Lightbulb Icon Insights Lightbulb Icon Training Icon Search Icon Turnitin Logo (Text and Icon) Icon Facebook Icon Twitter Icon LinkedIn Icon Google Plus Icon Lightbulb Icon Binoculars Icon Drama Masks Icon Magnifying Glass Icon Signal Check Indicator Bars Red Flag Icon Analysis and Organization Icon
Contact Sales

Fred Rogers once said--when there is a crisis, don’t lose hope: “look for the helpers.” Looking to helpers as models and sources of inspiration is a way to find direction and meaning. In the world of academic integrity, too, it’s easy to note the things that go wrong and to overlook progress and victories. It’s easy to get discouraged.

It’s time to take a break, look for the helpers, and applaud their work in the arena of contract cheating.

The battle against “contract cheating” (a term originated by Thomas Lancaster and Robert Clarke of Birmingham City University in a 2006 study), is buoyed by academic research. Lancaster and Clarke recognized contract cheating as the “successor to pure plagiarism,” and their initial work laid the foundation for continued research.


At the forefront of research today are Tracey Bretag (Director of Integrity, University of South Australia Business School) and Cath Ellis (Associate Dean of Education, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, UNSW Sydney). They’ve tirelessly pioneered research on contract cheating, responsible for raising awareness and driving action against contract cheating. Resulting actions are measurable: they include legislation against contract cheating in Australia, The Republic of Ireland, and New Zealand.


Bretag and Ellis’s accomplishments include:


This year, they were named by Times Higher Education as People of the Year: Who Mattered in Higher Education in 2019.


Their recognition is well deserved. And we applaud them.

How can we follow in their footsteps and become helpers, too? Because each of us can make a positive change in either incremental or disruptive ways.

1. One of the ways educators can help is to identify tell-tale signs of unoriginal work in student assignments:

  • Referencing and citation irregularities
  • Differences in student diction (such as different regional idioms) and voice
  • The assignment does not answer the question -- or sounds dated
  • Irregularities across student work history (which includes error patterns or grammar usage patterns)
  • Few references to ideas presented in class
  • Multiple references pointing to a single resource
  • Perfect referencing but not in the format you’ve assigned
  • Document metadata reveals inconsistencies--e.g., the author of the document isn’t the student
  • Shallow, formulaic structured content

2. Educating yourself and your students bolsters your ability to make change:

3. Educators can become helpers by actively engaging in prevention:

  • Sign up for the International Day Against Contract Cheating
  • Include an academic integrity statement on your syllabus that addresses and defines contract cheating
  • Allow for late assignments so as to mitigate last-minute panic for students
  • Multiple drafts with formative feedback provide a chain of communication and documentation of original writing
  • Support academic buoyancy in students to help them make healthier decisions under pressure
  • Consider assessment design
    • Lancaster states that essay mills want run-of-the-mill assessments that they can turn out with minimal effort. Essay mills don’t usually like obscure assignments that require higher-level thinking.
    • Provide a mix of different kinds of assessments, and include in-class supervised assessment.
    • Have students write proposals of written assignments, as well as interim drafts



    We commend all the helpers in the world. And we commend you for helping each other transform the academic landscape for the better.

    Learn more about Turnitin Originality

    Subscribe!

    Turnitin blog posts, delivered straight to your inbox.