Address the originality of student work and emerging trends in misconduct with this comprehensive solution.
Deliver and grade all types of assessments from anywhere using this modern assessment platform.
This high-stakes plagiarism checking tool is the gold standard for academic researchers and publishers.
This robust, comprehensive plagiarism checker fits seamlessly into existing workflows.
Give feedback and grade assignments with this tool that fosters writing excellence and academic integrity.
Uphold academic integrity, streamline grading and feedback, and protect your reputation with these tools.
Improve student writing, check for text similarity, and help develop original thinking skills with these tools for teachers.
Publish with confidence using the tool top researchers and publishers trust to ensure the originality of scholarly works.
Turnitin blog posts, delivered straight to your inbox.
Instructors spend hours each week grading and often don’t get to use questions and assignments that truly assess their students' learning. With Gradescope, not only will you spend less time providing feedback and marking papers, but you have the opportunity to assess more robustly.
It’s common, in both STEM and non-STEM disciplines, for exams to have two parts: a multiple choice section and a set of free-response questions.
Why are exams so often formatted in this way? Efficiency may be one driving factor: an answer sheet, such as a bubble sheet form, can be machine-graded quickly and accurately, often a necessity with high enrollment courses. But, instructors also want to be able to assess higher-level learning outcomes, so they include open-ended, essay, or problem-solving questions, and might use a test booklet to facilitate collecting the students’ written exam responses in a standardized format.
Although this two-component formatting approach comes with a certain level of efficiency afforded by auto-graded multiple choice questions, and includes the ability to assess each student’s writing and thinking, there are downsides, too: it can be time consuming for the instructors and leave the student wondering why they got the score they did. For the bubble sheet section, there are limitations on the number of answer choices a question can have and how to assign partial credit. The two exam components each have a separate score, where the test booklet score must be recorded manually in a spreadsheet, then consolidated with the bubble sheet score and uploaded to the LMS gradebook.
With a few simple tweaks to their exam format, instructors have the ability with Gradescope to collect and grade a two-component exam in a single PDF, producing a single exam score for both components. After delivering their assessment to students on paper in class, instructors then digitize and grade them in Gradescope using a templated exam/quiz assignment.
Gradescope’s dynamic rubrics and answer grouping feature make it fast and easy to provide more detailed, personalized feedback than is possible with bubble sheet or test booklet grading. Using AI-assisted grading and manual answer grouping to grade both the multiple choice and the free response components will make grading efficient, as well as consistent.
The two-component approach, by its design, separates the multiple choice portion from the free response portion, making it difficult to ask two related questions of different types on the exam. Gradescope does not limit instructors on the format of their multiple choice questions (i.e. 5 answer options with 1 correct choice), or the order to ask them in—they can opt to mix the multiple choice and free response questions throughout the test.
And because Gradescope helps speed the process for grading question types other than multiple choice, too—including fill-in-the-blank or matching-type; proofs; short essay questions; and drawings/graphs—instructors, simply by reformatting their multiple choice questions as another of these types, have many more possibilities for assessing student learning.