campaign
Turnitin launches iThenticate 2.0 to help maintain integrity of high stakes content with AI writing detection
Learn more
cancel
Videos

The progression of research integrity at global universities (Part 2)

Episode #12

In this video (part 2 of 2), Dr Daniel Barr continues his discussion on the progression of research integrity at universities, and addresses fragmented approaches to research integrity.

Videos
The progression of research integrity at global universities (Part 1)

In this video (part 1 of 2), Dr Daniel Barr discusses his role as Principal Research Integrity Advisor at RMIT in facilitating the responsible conduct of HDR and PHD research and supporting the research community.
Videos
Lifting educational aspirations and capacity in rural and remote communities

We chat to Helen Huntly, Provost at Central Queensland University, about lifting educational aspirations & capacity in regional, rural and remote communities
Videos
Disruption in higher education & the rise of skill-based learning and micro-credentialing (Part 1)

In this video (part 1 of 2), Dr Kevin Bell explores how higher education is facing increased competition from industry disruptors, with pressure on Australian universities to invest in more flexible learning modalities to meet evolving workforce needs.

Kevin deep-dives into the concept of ‘micro-credentialing’ and raises the fundamental question of whether such learning approaches can make students competent to perform their future jobs more effectively and in a shorter amount of time.

He also explores whether such learning delivery may miss out on peripheral benefits associated with a traditional degree, including soft skills to develop well-rounded professionals.

Dr Daniel Barr | Principal Research Integrity Advisor at RMIT University

In this video (part 2 of 2), Dr Daniel Barr continues his discussion on the progression of research integrity at universities, and addresses fragmented approaches to research integrity.

Advocating for a universality of research integrity principles, Daniel asserts the need to go beyond high-level commitments, and explores the idea of integrity ‘markers’ or indicators, toward a shared, global understanding of research best practice.

Finally, he speculates on what form this may take, in terms of an official ‘passport’ or credential to bolster a culture and community around research integrity.

← Watch part 1

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.